Why do we regularise in every iteration for imaging inverse problems?

Evangelos Papoutsellis, Zeljko Kereta, Kostas Papafitsoros
11/1/2024
math.NAcs.CVmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Regularisation is commonly used in iterative methods for solving imaging inverse problems. Many algorithms involve the evaluation of the proximal operator of the regularisation term in every iteration, leading to a significant computational overhead since such evaluation can be costly. In this context, the ProxSkip algorithm, recently proposed for federated learning purposes, emerges as an solution. It randomly skips regularisation steps, reducing the computational time of an iterative algorithm without affecting its convergence. Here we explore for the first time the efficacy of ProxSkip to a variety of imaging inverse problems and we also propose a novel PDHGSkip version. Extensive numerical results highlight the potential of these methods to accelerate computations while maintaining high-quality reconstructions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{papoutsellis2024regularise,
  title  = {Why do we regularise in every iteration for imaging inverse problems?},
  author = {Evangelos Papoutsellis and Zeljko Kereta and Kostas Papafitsoros},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.00688},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00688v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.00688.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.00688)

Discussion