Marginal Causal Flows for Validation and Inference

Daniel de Vassimon Manela, Laura Battaglia, Robin J. Evans
11/2/2024
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ME

No official code found. Best implementation: llaurabatt/frugal-flows (6 stars, last commit 2025-01-14).

Abstract

Investigating the marginal causal effect of an intervention on an outcome from complex data remains challenging due to the inflexibility of employed models and the lack of complexity in causal benchmark datasets, which often fail to reproduce intricate real-world data patterns. In this paper we introduce Frugal Flows, a novel likelihood-based machine learning model that uses normalising flows to flexibly learn the data-generating process, while also directly inferring the marginal causal quantities from observational data. We propose that these models are exceptionally well suited for generating synthetic data to validate causal methods. They can create synthetic datasets that closely resemble the empirical dataset, while automatically and exactly satisfying a user-defined average treatment effect. To our knowledge, Frugal Flows are the first generative model to both learn flexible data representations and also exactly parameterise quantities such as the average treatment effect and the degree of unobserved confounding. We demonstrate the above with experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

61R, PythonMar 20, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{manela2024marginal,
  title  = {Marginal Causal Flows for Validation and Inference},
  author = {Daniel de Vassimon Manela and Laura Battaglia and Robin J. Evans},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.01295},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi    = {10.48550/arXiv.2411.01295},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01295v2},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.01295.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.01295)

Discussion