Socially-Aware Opinion-Based Navigation with Oval Limit Cycles

Giulia d'Addato, Placido Falqueto, Luigi Palopoli, Daniele Fontanelli
11/7/2024
cs.ROcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

When humans move in a shared space, they choose navigation strategies that preserve their mutual safety. At the same time, each human seeks to minimise the number of modifications to her/his path. In order to achieve this result, humans use unwritten rules and reach a consensus on their decisions about the motion direction by exchanging non-verbal messages. They then implement their choice in a mutually acceptable way. Socially-aware navigation denotes a research effort aimed at replicating this logic inside robots. Existing results focus either on how robots can participate in negotiations with humans, or on how they can move in a socially acceptable way. We propose a holistic approach in which the two aspects are jointly considered. Specifically, we show that by combining opinion dynamics (to reach a consensus) with vortex fields (to generate socially acceptable trajectories), the result outperforms the application of the two techniques in isolation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{daddato2024sociallyaware,
  title  = {Socially-Aware Opinion-Based Navigation with Oval Limit Cycles},
  author = {Giulia d'Addato and Placido Falqueto and Luigi Palopoli and Daniele Fontanelli},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.04678},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04678v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.04678.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.04678)

Discussion