Pruning the Path to Optimal Care: Identifying Systematically Suboptimal Medical Decision-Making with Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Inko Bovenzi, Adi Carmel, Michael Hu, Rebecca M. Hurwitz, Fiona McBride +3 more
11/7/2024
cs.LGq-bio.QMstat.AP

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In aims to uncover insights into medical decision-making embedded within observational data from clinical settings, we present a novel application of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) that identifies suboptimal clinician actions based on the actions of their peers. This approach centers two stages of IRL with an intermediate step to prune trajectories displaying behavior that deviates significantly from the consensus. This enables us to effectively identify clinical priorities and values from ICU data containing both optimal and suboptimal clinician decisions. We observe that the benefits of removing suboptimal actions vary by disease and differentially impact certain demographic groups.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bovenzi2024pruning,
  title  = {Pruning the Path to Optimal Care: Identifying Systematically Suboptimal Medical Decision-Making with Inverse Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Inko Bovenzi and Adi Carmel and Michael Hu and Rebecca M. Hurwitz and Fiona McBride and Leo Benac and José Roberto Tello Ayala and Finale Doshi-Velez},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.05237},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05237v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.05237.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.05237)

Discussion