Are LLMs Prescient? A Continuous Evaluation using Daily News as the Oracle

Hui Dai, R. Teehan, Mengye Ren
2/12/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Many existing evaluation benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) quickly become outdated due to the emergence of new models and training data. These benchmarks also fall short in assessing how LLM performance changes over time, as they consist of a static set of questions without a temporal dimension. To address these limitations, we propose using future event prediction as a continuous evaluation method to assess LLMs'temporal generalization and forecasting abilities. Our benchmark, Daily Oracle, automatically generates question-answer (QA) pairs from daily news, challenging LLMs to predict"future"event outcomes. Our findings reveal that as pre-training data becomes outdated, LLM performance degrades over time. While Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has the potential to enhance prediction accuracy, the performance degradation pattern persists, highlighting the need for continuous model updates. Code and data are available at https://agenticlearning.ai/daily-oracle.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{dai2026llms,
  title  = {Are LLMs Prescient? A Continuous Evaluation using Daily News as the Oracle},
  author = {Hui Dai and R. Teehan and Mengye Ren},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2411.08324},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08324},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.08324.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.08324)

Discussion