Utilizing Large Language Models to Synthesize Product Desirability Datasets

John D. Hastings, Sherri Weitl-Harms, Joseph Doty, Zachary J. Myers, Warren Thompson
11/20/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

This research explores the application of large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic datasets for Product Desirability Toolkit (PDT) testing, a key component in evaluating user sentiment and product experience. Utilizing gpt-4o-mini, a cost-effective alternative to larger commercial LLMs, three methods, Word+Review, Review+Word, and Supply-Word, were each used to synthesize 1000 product reviews. The generated datasets were assessed for sentiment alignment, textual diversity, and data generation cost. Results demonstrated high sentiment alignment across all methods, with Pearson correlations ranging from 0.93 to 0.97. Supply-Word exhibited the highest diversity and coverage of PDT terms, although with increased generation costs. Despite minor biases toward positive sentiments, in situations with limited test data, LLM-generated synthetic data offers significant advantages, including scalability, cost savings, and flexibility in dataset production.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hastings2024utilizing,
  title  = {Utilizing Large Language Models to Synthesize Product Desirability Datasets},
  author = {John D. Hastings and Sherri Weitl-Harms and Joseph Doty and Zachary J. Myers and Warren Thompson},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.13485},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13485v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.13485.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.13485)

Discussion