Decompose and Leverage Preferences from Expert Models for Improving Trustworthiness of MLLMs

Rui Cao, Yuming Jiang, Michael Schlichtkrull, Andreas Vlachos
11/20/2024
cs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: abril4416/DGPref (3 stars, last commit 2025-06-22).

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can enhance trustworthiness by aligning with human preferences. As human preference labeling is laborious, recent works employ evaluation models for assessing MLLMs' responses, using the model-based assessments to automate preference dataset construction. This approach, however, faces challenges with MLLMs' lengthy and compositional responses, which often require diverse reasoning skills that a single evaluation model may not fully possess. Additionally, most existing methods rely on closed-source models as evaluators. To address limitations, we propose DecompGen, a decomposable framework that uses an ensemble of open-sourced expert models. DecompGen breaks down each response into atomic verification tasks, assigning each task to an appropriate expert model to generate fine-grained assessments. The DecompGen feedback is used to automatically construct our preference dataset, DGPref. MLLMs aligned with DGPref via preference learning show improvements in trustworthiness, demonstrating the effectiveness of DecompGen.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

abril4416/DGPrefCommunity100%
30PythonNov 19, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cao2024decompose,
  title  = {Decompose and Leverage Preferences from Expert Models for Improving Trustworthiness of MLLMs},
  author = {Rui Cao and Yuming Jiang and Michael Schlichtkrull and Andreas Vlachos},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.13697},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13697v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.13697.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.13697)

Discussion