Improving Deformable Image Registration Accuracy through a Hybrid Similarity Metric and CycleGAN Based Auto-Segmentation

Keyur D. Shah, James A. Shackleford, Nagarajan Kandasamy, Gregory C. Sharp
11/25/2024
physics.med-phcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Purpose: Deformable image registration (DIR) is critical in adaptive radiation therapy (ART) to account for anatomical changes. Conventional intensity-based DIR methods often fail when image intensities differ. This study evaluates a hybrid similarity metric combining intensity and structural information, leveraging CycleGAN-based intensity correction and auto-segmentation across three DIR workflows. Methods: A hybrid similarity metric combining a point-to-distance (PD) score and intensity similarity was implemented. Synthetic CT (sCT) images were generated using a 2D CycleGAN model trained on unpaired CT and CBCT images to enhance soft-tissue contrast. DIR workflows compared included: (1) traditional intensity-based (No PD), (2) auto-segmented contours on sCT (CycleGAN PD), and (3) expert manual contours (Expert PD). A 3D U-Net model trained on 56 images and validated on 14 cases segmented the prostate, bladder, and rectum. DIR accuracy was assessed using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD), and fiducial separation. Results: The hybrid metric improved DIR accuracy. For the prostate, DSC increased from 0.61+/-0.18 (No PD) to 0.82+/-0.13 (CycleGAN PD) and 0.89+/-0.05 (Expert PD), with reductions in 95% HD from 11.75 mm to 4.86 mm and 3.27 mm, respectively. Fiducial separation decreased from 8.95 mm to 4.07 mm (CycleGAN PD) and 4.11 mm (Expert PD) (p < 0.05). Improvements were also observed for the bladder and rectum. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a hybrid similarity metric using CycleGAN-based auto-segmentation improves DIR accuracy, particularly for low-contrast CBCT images. These findings highlight the potential for integrating AI-based image correction and segmentation into ART workflows to enhance precision and streamline clinical processes.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{shah2024improving,
  title  = {Improving Deformable Image Registration Accuracy through a Hybrid Similarity Metric and CycleGAN Based Auto-Segmentation},
  author = {Keyur D. Shah and James A. Shackleford and Nagarajan Kandasamy and Gregory C. Sharp},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.16992},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16992v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.16992.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.16992)

Discussion