Dual-Representation Interaction Driven Image Quality Assessment with Restoration Assistance

Jingtong Yue, Xin Lin, Zijiu Yang, Chao Ren
11/26/2024
eess.IVcs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: Jingtong0527/DRI-IQA (1 star, last commit 2024-11-26).

Abstract

No-Reference Image Quality Assessment for distorted images has always been a challenging problem due to image content variance and distortion diversity. Previous IQA models mostly encode explicit single-quality features of synthetic images to obtain quality-aware representations for quality score prediction. However, performance decreases when facing real-world distortion and restored images from restoration models. The reason is that they do not consider the degradation factors of the low-quality images adequately. To address this issue, we first introduce the DRI method to obtain degradation vectors and quality vectors of images, which separately model the degradation and quality information of low-quality images. After that, we add the restoration network to provide the MOS score predictor with degradation information. Then, we design the Representation-based Semantic Loss (RS Loss) to assist in enhancing effective interaction between representations. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method performs favorably against existing state-of-the-art models on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

10Nov 26, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yue2024dualrepresentation,
  title  = {Dual-Representation Interaction Driven Image Quality Assessment with Restoration Assistance},
  author = {Jingtong Yue and Xin Lin and Zijiu Yang and Chao Ren},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.17390},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17390v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.17390.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.17390)

Discussion