Machine learning the Ising transition: A comparison between discriminative and generative approaches

Difei Zhang, Frank Schäfer, Julian Arnold
11/28/2024
cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The detection of phase transitions is a central task in many-body physics. To automate this process, the task can be phrased as a classification problem. Classification problems can be approached in two fundamentally distinct ways: through either a discriminative or a generative method. In general, it is unclear which of these two approaches is most suitable for a given problem. The choice is expected to depend on factors such as the availability of system knowledge, dataset size, desired accuracy, computational resources, and other considerations. In this work, we answer the question of how one should approach the solution of phase-classification problems by performing a numerical case study on the thermal phase transition in the classical two-dimensional square-lattice ferromagnetic Ising model.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2024machine,
  title  = {Machine learning the Ising transition: A comparison between discriminative and generative approaches},
  author = {Difei Zhang and Frank Schäfer and Julian Arnold},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.19370},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19370v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.19370.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.19370)

Discussion