Exploring ReAct Prompting for Task-Oriented Dialogue: Insights and Shortcomings

Michelle Elizabeth, Morgan Veyret, Miguel Couceiro, Ondrej Dusek, Lina M. Rojas-Barahona
12/2/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) gained immense popularity due to their impressive capabilities in unstructured conversations. Empowering LLMs with advanced prompting strategies such as reasoning and acting (ReAct) (Yao et al., 2022) has shown promise in solving complex tasks traditionally requiring reinforcement learning. In this work, we apply the ReAct strategy to guide LLMs performing task-oriented dialogue (TOD). We evaluate ReAct-based LLMs (ReAct-LLMs) both in simulation and with real users. While ReAct-LLMs severely underperform state-of-the-art approaches on success rate in simulation, this difference becomes less pronounced in human evaluation. Moreover, compared to the baseline, humans report higher subjective satisfaction with ReAct-LLM despite its lower success rate, most likely thanks to its natural and confidently phrased responses.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{elizabeth2024exploring,
  title  = {Exploring ReAct Prompting for Task-Oriented Dialogue: Insights and Shortcomings},
  author = {Michelle Elizabeth and Morgan Veyret and Miguel Couceiro and Ondrej Dusek and Lina M. Rojas-Barahona},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.01262},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01262v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.01262.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.01262)

Discussion