If Eleanor Rigby Had Met ChatGPT: A Study on Loneliness in a Post-LLM World

Adrian de Wynter
12/2/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY

No official code found. Best implementation: adewynter/EleanorRigby (2 stars, MIT, last commit 2025-06-26).

Abstract

Warning: this paper discusses content related, but not limited to, violence, sex, and suicide. Loneliness, or the lack of fulfilling relationships, significantly impacts a person's mental and physical well-being and is prevalent worldwide. Previous research suggests that large language models (LLMs) may help mitigate loneliness. However, we argue that the use of widespread LLMs in services like ChatGPT is more prevalent--and riskier, as they are not designed for this purpose. To explore this, we analysed user interactions with ChatGPT outside of its marketed use as a task-oriented assistant. In dialogues classified as lonely, users frequently (37%) sought advice or validation, and received good engagement. However, ChatGPT failed in sensitive scenarios, like responding appropriately to suicidal ideation or trauma. We also observed a 35% higher incidence of toxic content, with women being 22x more likely to be targeted than men. Our findings underscore ethical and legal questions about this technology, and note risks like radicalisation or further isolation. We conclude with recommendations to research and industry to address loneliness.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

Repository for the paper "If Eleanor Rigby Had Met ChatGPT"

20Jupyter NotebookDec 2, 20241 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wynter2024eleanor,
  title  = {If Eleanor Rigby Had Met ChatGPT: A Study on Loneliness in a Post-LLM World},
  author = {Adrian de Wynter},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.01617},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01617v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.01617.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.01617)

Discussion