The Space Complexity of Approximating Logistic Loss

Gregory Dexter, Petros Drineas, Rajiv Khanna
12/3/2024
cs.DScs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We provide space complexity lower bounds for data structures that approximate logistic loss up to $ε$-relative error on a logistic regression problem with data $\mathbf{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ and labels $\mathbf{y} \in \{-1,1\}^d$. The space complexity of existing coreset constructions depend on a natural complexity measure $μ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X})$, first defined in (Munteanu, 2018). We give an $\tildeΩ(\frac{d}{ε^2})$ space complexity lower bound in the regime $μ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X}) = O(1)$ that shows existing coresets are optimal in this regime up to lower order factors. We also prove a general $\tildeΩ(d\cdot μ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X}))$ space lower bound when $ε$ is constant, showing that the dependency on $μ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X})$ is not an artifact of mergeable coresets. Finally, we refute a prior conjecture that $μ_\mathbf{y}(\mathbf{X})$ is hard to compute by providing an efficient linear programming formulation, and we empirically compare our algorithm to prior approximate methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{dexter2024space,
  title  = {The Space Complexity of Approximating Logistic Loss},
  author = {Gregory Dexter and Petros Drineas and Rajiv Khanna},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.02639},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi    = {10.48550/arXiv.2412.02639},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02639v1},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.02639.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.02639)

Discussion