GS-Matching: Reconsidering Feature Matching task in Point Cloud Registration

Yaojie Zhang, Tianlun Huang, Weijun Wang, Wei Feng
12/6/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Traditional point cloud registration (PCR) methods for feature matching often employ the nearest neighbor policy. This leads to many-to-one matches and numerous potential inliers without any corresponding point. Recently, some approaches have framed the feature matching task as an assignment problem to achieve optimal one-to-one matches. We argue that the transition to the Assignment problem is not reliable for general correspondence-based PCR. In this paper, we propose a heuristics stable matching policy called GS-matching, inspired by the Gale-Shapley algorithm. Compared to the other matching policies, our method can perform efficiently and find more non-repetitive inliers under low overlapping conditions. Furthermore, we employ the probability theory to analyze the feature matching task, providing new insights into this research problem. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our matching policy, achieving better registration recall on multiple datasets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2024gsmatching,
  title  = {GS-Matching: Reconsidering Feature Matching task in Point Cloud Registration},
  author = {Yaojie Zhang and Tianlun Huang and Weijun Wang and Wei Feng},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.04855},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04855v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.04855.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.04855)

Discussion