Stably unactivated neurons in ReLU neural networks

Natalie Brownlowe, Christopher R. Cornwell, Ethan Montes, Gabriel Quijano, Grace Stulman +1 more
12/6/2024
cs.LGmath.PRstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The choice of architecture of a neural network influences which functions will be realizable by that neural network and, as a result, studying the expressiveness of a chosen architecture has received much attention. In ReLU neural networks, the presence of stably unactivated neurons can reduce the network's expressiveness. In this work, we investigate the probability of a neuron in the second hidden layer of such neural networks being stably unactivated when the weights and biases are initialized from symmetric probability distributions. For networks with input dimension $n_0$, we prove that if the first hidden layer has $n_0+1$ neurons then this probability is exactly $\frac{2^{n_0}+1}{4^{n_0+1}}$, and if the first hidden layer has $n_1$ neurons, $n_1 \le n_0$, then the probability is $\frac{1}{2^{n_1+1}}$. Finally, for the case when the first hidden layer has more neurons than $n_0+1$, a conjecture is proposed along with the rationale. Computational evidence is presented to support the conjecture.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{brownlowe2024stably,
  title  = {Stably unactivated neurons in ReLU neural networks},
  author = {Natalie Brownlowe and Christopher R. Cornwell and Ethan Montes and Gabriel Quijano and Grace Stulman and Na Zhang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.06829},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06829v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.06829.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.06829)

Discussion