Too Big to Fool: Resisting Deception in Language Models

Mohammad Reza Samsami, Mats Leon Richter, Juan Rodriguez, Megh Thakkar, Sarath Chandar +1 more
12/13/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models must balance their weight-encoded knowledge with in-context information from prompts to generate accurate responses. This paper investigates this interplay by analyzing how models of varying capacities within the same family handle intentionally misleading in-context information. Our experiments demonstrate that larger models exhibit higher resilience to deceptive prompts, showcasing an advanced ability to interpret and integrate prompt information with their internal knowledge. Furthermore, we find that larger models outperform smaller ones in following legitimate instructions, indicating that their resilience is not due to disregarding in-context information. We also show that this phenomenon is likely not a result of memorization but stems from the models' ability to better leverage implicit task-relevant information from the prompt alongside their internally stored knowledge.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{samsami2024fool,
  title  = {Too Big to Fool: Resisting Deception in Language Models},
  author = {Mohammad Reza Samsami and Mats Leon Richter and Juan Rodriguez and Megh Thakkar and Sarath Chandar and Maxime Gasse},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.10558},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10558v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.10558.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.10558)

Discussion