Bayesian inference of mean velocity fields and turbulence models from flow MRI

A. Kontogiannis, P. Nair, M. Loecher, D. B. Ennis, A. Marsden +1 more
12/15/2024
physics.flu-dyncs.LGmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We solve a Bayesian inverse Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) problem that assimilates mean flow data by jointly reconstructing the mean flow field and learning its unknown RANS parameters. We devise an algorithm that learns the most likely parameters of an algebraic effective viscosity model, and estimates their uncertainties, from mean flow data of a turbulent flow. We conduct a flow MRI experiment to obtain mean flow data of a confined turbulent jet in an idealized medical device known as the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) nozzle. The algorithm successfully reconstructs the mean flow field and learns the most likely turbulence model parameters without overfitting. The methodology accepts any turbulence model, be it algebraic (explicit) or multi-equation (implicit), as long as the model is differentiable, and naturally extends to unsteady turbulent flows.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kontogiannis2024bayesian,
  title  = {Bayesian inference of mean velocity fields and turbulence models from flow MRI},
  author = {A. Kontogiannis and P. Nair and M. Loecher and D. B. Ennis and A. Marsden and M. P. Juniper},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.11266},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11266v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.11266.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.11266)

Discussion