PCM Selector: Penalized Covariate-Mediator Selection Operator for Evaluating Linear Causal Effects

Hisayoshi Nanmo, Manabu Kuroki
12/24/2024
stat.MEcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

For a data-generating process for random variables that can be described with a linear structural equation model, we consider a situation in which (i) a set of covariates satisfying the back-door criterion cannot be observed or (ii) such a set can be observed, but standard statistical estimation methods cannot be applied to estimate causal effects because of multicollinearity/high-dimensional data problems. We propose a novel two-stage penalized regression approach, the penalized covariate-mediator selection operator (PCM Selector), to estimate the causal effects in such scenarios. Unlike existing penalized regression analyses, when a set of intermediate variables is available, PCM Selector provides a consistent or less biased estimator of the causal effect. In addition, PCM Selector provides a variable selection procedure for intermediate variables to obtain better estimation accuracy of the causal effects than does the back-door criterion.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{nanmo2024selector,
  title  = {PCM Selector: Penalized Covariate-Mediator Selection Operator for Evaluating Linear Causal Effects},
  author = {Hisayoshi Nanmo and Manabu Kuroki},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.18180},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18180v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.18180.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.18180)

Discussion