Zero-Shot Strategies for Length-Controllable Summarization

Fabian Retkowski, Alexander Waibel
12/31/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) struggle with precise length control, particularly in zero-shot settings. We conduct a comprehensive study evaluating LLMs' length control capabilities across multiple measures and propose practical methods to improve controllability. Our experiments with LLaMA 3 reveal stark differences in length adherence across measures and highlight inherent biases of the model. To address these challenges, we introduce a set of methods: length approximation, target adjustment, sample filtering, and automated revisions. By combining these methods, we demonstrate substantial improvements in length compliance while maintaining or enhancing summary quality, providing highly effective zero-shot strategies for precise length control without the need for model fine-tuning or architectural changes. With our work, we not only advance our understanding of LLM behavior in controlled text generation but also pave the way for more reliable and adaptable summarization systems in real-world applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{retkowski2024zeroshot,
  title  = {Zero-Shot Strategies for Length-Controllable Summarization},
  author = {Fabian Retkowski and Alexander Waibel},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2501.00233},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00233v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.00233.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.00233)

Discussion