Enhancing Reasoning through Process Supervision with Monte Carlo Tree Search

Shuangtao Li, Shuaihao Dong, Kexin Luan, Xinhan Di, Chaofan Ding
1/2/2025
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their remarkable capacity across a variety of tasks. However, reasoning remains a challenge for LLMs. To improve LLMs' reasoning ability, process supervision has proven to be better than outcome supervision. In this work, we study using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to generate process supervision data with LLMs themselves for training them. We sample reasoning steps with an LLM and assign each step a score that captures its "relative correctness," and the LLM is then trained by minimizing weighted log-likelihood of generating the reasoning steps. This generate-then-train process is repeated iteratively until convergence.Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methods considerably improve the performance of LLMs on two mathematical reasoning datasets. Furthermore, models trained on one dataset also exhibit improved performance on the other, showing the transferability of the enhanced reasoning ability.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2025enhancing,
  title  = {Enhancing Reasoning through Process Supervision with Monte Carlo Tree Search},
  author = {Shuangtao Li and Shuaihao Dong and Kexin Luan and Xinhan Di and Chaofan Ding},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.01478},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01478v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.01478.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.01478)

Discussion