Learning to Transfer Human Hand Skills for Robot Manipulations

Sungjae Park, Seungho Lee, Mingi Choi, Jiye Lee, Jeonghwan Kim +2 more
1/7/2025
cs.ROcs.AIcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: RUreadyo/MocapRobot (0 stars, last commit 2025-12-09).

Abstract

We present a method for teaching dexterous manipulation tasks to robots from human hand motion demonstrations. Unlike existing approaches that solely rely on kinematics information without taking into account the plausibility of robot and object interaction, our method directly infers plausible robot manipulation actions from human motion demonstrations. To address the embodiment gap between the human hand and the robot system, our approach learns a joint motion manifold that maps human hand movements, robot hand actions, and object movements in 3D, enabling us to infer one motion component from others. Our key idea is the generation of pseudo-supervision triplets, which pair human, object, and robot motion trajectories synthetically. Through real-world experiments with robot hand manipulation, we demonstrate that our data-driven retargeting method significantly outperforms conventional retargeting techniques, effectively bridging the embodiment gap between human and robotic hands. Website at https://rureadyo.github.io/MocapRobot/.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Learning to Transfer Human Hand Skills for Robot Manipulations

00CSS, HTMLNov 4, 202410 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{park2025learning,
  title  = {Learning to Transfer Human Hand Skills for Robot Manipulations},
  author = {Sungjae Park and Seungho Lee and Mingi Choi and Jiye Lee and Jeonghwan Kim and Jisoo Kim and Hanbyul Joo},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.04169},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04169v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.04169.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.04169)

Discussion