Practical Design and Benchmarking of Generative AI Applications for Surgical Billing and Coding

John C. Rollman, Bruce Rogers, Hamed Zaribafzadeh, Daniel Buckland, Ursula Rogers +11 more
1/7/2025
cs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare has many manual processes that can benefit from automation and augmentation with Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), the medical billing and coding process. However, current foundational Large Language Models (LLMs) perform poorly when tasked with generating accurate International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Additionally, there are many security and financial challenges in the application of generative AI to healthcare. We present a strategy for developing generative AI tools in healthcare, specifically for medical billing and coding, that balances accuracy, accessibility, and patient privacy. Methods: We fine tune the PHI-3 Mini and PHI-3 Medium LLMs using institutional data and compare the results against the PHI-3 base model, a PHI-3 RAG application, and GPT-4o. We use the post operative surgical report as input and the patients billing claim the associated ICD-10, CPT, and Modifier codes as the target result. Performance is measured by accuracy of code generation, proportion of invalid codes, and the fidelity of the billing claim format. Results: Both fine-tuned models performed better or as well as GPT-4o. The Phi-3 Medium fine-tuned model showed the best performance (ICD-10 Recall and Precision: 72%, 72%; CPT Recall and Precision: 77%, 79%; Modifier Recall and Precision: 63%, 64%). The Phi-3 Medium fine-tuned model only fabricated 1% of ICD-10 codes and 0.6% of CPT codes generated. Conclusions: Our study shows that a small model that is fine-tuned on domain-specific data for specific tasks using a simple set of open-source tools and minimal technological and monetary requirements performs as well as the larger contemporary consumer models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rollman2025practical,
  title  = {Practical Design and Benchmarking of Generative AI Applications for Surgical Billing and Coding},
  author = {John C. Rollman and Bruce Rogers and Hamed Zaribafzadeh and Daniel Buckland and Ursula Rogers and Jennifer Gagnon and Ozanan Meireles and Lindsay Jennings and Jim Bennett and Jennifer Nicholson and Nandan Lad and Linda Cendales and Andreas Seas and Alessandro Martinino and E. Shelley Hwang and Allan D. Kirk},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.05479},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05479v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.05479.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.05479)

Discussion