Fine-tuning is Not Fine: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in GNNs with Limited Clean Data

Jiale Zhang, Bosen Rao, Chengcheng Zhu, Xiaobing Sun, Qingming Li +4 more
1/10/2025
cs.LGcs.CR

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable performance through their message-passing mechanism. However, recent studies have highlighted the vulnerability of GNNs to backdoor attacks, which can lead the model to misclassify graphs with attached triggers as the target class. The effectiveness of recent promising defense techniques, such as fine-tuning or distillation, is heavily contingent on having comprehensive knowledge of the sufficient training dataset. Empirical studies have shown that fine-tuning methods require a clean dataset of 20% to reduce attack accuracy to below 25%, while distillation methods require a clean dataset of 15%. However, obtaining such a large amount of clean data is commonly impractical. In this paper, we propose a practical backdoor mitigation framework, denoted as GRAPHNAD, which can capture high-quality intermediate-layer representations in GNNs to enhance the distillation process with limited clean data. To achieve this, we address the following key questions: How to identify the appropriate attention representations in graphs for distillation? How to enhance distillation with limited data? By adopting the graph attention transfer method, GRAPHNAD can effectively align the intermediate-layer attention representations of the backdoored model with that of the teacher model, forcing the backdoor neurons to transform into benign ones. Besides, we extract the relation maps from intermediate-layer transformation and enforce the relation maps of the backdoored model to be consistent with that of the teacher model, thereby ensuring model accuracy while further reducing the influence of backdoors. Extensive experimental results show that by fine-tuning a teacher model with only 3% of the clean data, GRAPHNAD can reduce the attack success rate to below 5%.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2025finetuning,
  title  = {Fine-tuning is Not Fine: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in GNNs with Limited Clean Data},
  author = {Jiale Zhang and Bosen Rao and Chengcheng Zhu and Xiaobing Sun and Qingming Li and Haibo Hu and Xiapu Luo and Qingqing Ye and Shouling Ji},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.05835},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05835v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.05835.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.05835)

Discussion