Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit Learning

Benjamin Schiffer, Shirley Zhang
1/13/2025
cs.GTcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study online fair division when there are a finite number of item types and the player values for the items are drawn randomly from distributions with unknown means. In this setting, a sequence of indivisible items arrives according to a random online process, and each item must be allocated to a single player. The goal is to maximize expected social welfare while maintaining that the allocation satisfies proportionality in expectation. When player values are normalized, we show that it is possible to with high probability guarantee proportionality constraint satisfaction and achieve $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret. To achieve this result, we present an upper confidence bound (UCB) algorithm that uses two rounds of linear optimization. This algorithm highlights fundamental aspects of proportionality constraints that allow for a UCB algorithm despite the presence of many (potentially tight) constraints. This result improves upon the previous best regret rate of $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{schiffer2025improved,
  title  = {Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit Learning},
  author = {Benjamin Schiffer and Shirley Zhang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.07022},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07022v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.07022.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.07022)

Discussion