Redundancy Principles for MLLMs Benchmarks

Zicheng Zhang, Xiangyu Zhao, Xinyu Fang, Chunyi Li, Xiaohong Liu +4 more
1/20/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: aiben-ch/Benchmark-Redundancy (10 stars, last commit 2025-08-20).

Abstract

With the rapid iteration of Multi-modality Large Language Models (MLLMs) and the evolving demands of the field, the number of benchmarks produced annually has surged into the hundreds. The rapid growth has inevitably led to significant redundancy among benchmarks. Therefore, it is crucial to take a step back and critically assess the current state of redundancy and propose targeted principles for constructing effective MLLM benchmarks. In this paper, we focus on redundancy from three key perspectives: 1) Redundancy of benchmark capability dimensions, 2) Redundancy in the number of test questions, and 3) Cross-benchmark redundancy within specific domains. Through the comprehensive analysis over hundreds of MLLMs' performance across more than 20 benchmarks, we aim to quantitatively measure the level of redundancy lies in existing MLLM evaluations, provide valuable insights to guide the future development of MLLM benchmarks, and offer strategies to refine and address redundancy issues effectively. The code is available at https://github.com/zzc-1998/Benchmark-Redundancy.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

[ACL 2025] Redundancy Principles for MLLMs Benchmarks

100PythonJan 13, 20251 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2025redundancy,
  title  = {Redundancy Principles for MLLMs Benchmarks},
  author = {Zicheng Zhang and Xiangyu Zhao and Xinyu Fang and Chunyi Li and Xiaohong Liu and Xiongkuo Min and Haodong Duan and Kai Chen and Guangtao Zhai},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.13953},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13953v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.13953.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.13953)

Discussion