Optimal Survey Design for Private Mean Estimation

Yu-Wei Chen, R. Pasupathy, Jordan A. Awan
2/14/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This work identifies the first privacy-aware stratified sampling scheme that minimizes the variance for general private mean estimation under the Laplace, Discrete Laplace (DLap) and Truncated-Uniform-Laplace (TuLap) mechanisms within the framework of differential privacy (DP). We view stratified sampling as a subsampling operation, which amplifies the privacy guarantee; however, to have the same final privacy guarantee for each group, different nominal privacy budgets need to be used depending on the subsampling rate. Ignoring the effect of DP, traditional stratified sampling strategies risk significant variance inflation. We phrase our optimal survey design as an optimization problem, where we determine the optimal subsampling sizes for each group with the goal of minimizing the variance of the resulting estimator. We establish strong convexity of the variance objective, propose an efficient algorithm to identify the integer-optimal design, and offer insights on the structure of the optimal design.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2026optimal,
  title  = {Optimal Survey Design for Private Mean Estimation},
  author = {Yu-Wei Chen and R. Pasupathy and Jordan A. Awan},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2501.18121},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18121},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.18121.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.18121)

Discussion