From Public Square to Echo Chamber: The Fragmentation of Online Discourse

Abhinav Pratap, Amit Pathak
1/30/2025
cs.CYcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper examines how social media algorithms and filter bubbles contribute to the fragmentation of online discourse, fostering ideological divides and undermining shared understanding. Drawing on Michael Sandels philosophical emphasis on community and shared values, the study explores how digital platforms amplify discrimination discourse including sexism, racism, xenophobia, ableism, homophobia, and religious intolerance during periods of heightened societal tension. By analyzing the dynamics of digital communities, the research highlights mechanisms driving the emergence and evolution of discourse fragments in response to real world events. The findings reveal how social media structures exacerbate polarization, restrict cross group dialogue, and erode the collective reasoning essential for a just society. This study situates philosophical perspectives within a computational analysis of social media interactions, offering a nuanced understanding of the challenges posed by fragmented discourse in the digital age.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pratap2025from,
  title  = {From Public Square to Echo Chamber: The Fragmentation of Online Discourse},
  author = {Abhinav Pratap and Amit Pathak},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.18441},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18441v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.18441.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.18441)

Discussion