The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model Training

Fabian Schaipp, Alexander Hägele, Adrien B. Taylor, Umut Simsekli, Francis R. Bach
2/14/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: fabian-sp/lr-scheduling (11 stars, MIT, last commit 2026-02-04).

Abstract

We show that learning-rate schedules for large model training behave surprisingly similar to a performance bound from non-smooth convex optimization theory. We provide a bound for the constant schedule with linear cooldown; in particular, the practical benefit of cooldown is reflected in the bound due to the absence of logarithmic terms. Further, we show that this surprisingly close match between optimization theory and practice can be exploited for learning-rate tuning: we achieve noticeable improvements for training 124M and 210M Llama-type models by (i) extending the schedule for continued training with optimal learning-rate, and (ii) transferring the optimal learning-rate across schedules.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

Code for "The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model Training"

110Shell, PythonJan 28, 20258 months agoMIT

Cite this paper

@article{schaipp2026surprising,
  title  = {The Surprising Agreement Between Convex Optimization Theory and Learning-Rate Scheduling for Large Model Training},
  author = {Fabian Schaipp and Alexander Hägele and Adrien B. Taylor and Umut Simsekli and Francis R. Bach},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2501.18965},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18965},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.18965.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.18965)

Discussion