Improving realistic semi-supervised learning with doubly robust estimation

Khiem Pham, Charles Herrmann, Ramin Zabih
2/1/2025
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

A major challenge in Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) is the limited information available about the class distribution in the unlabeled data. In many real-world applications this arises from the prevalence of long-tailed distributions, where the standard pseudo-label approach to SSL is biased towards the labeled class distribution and thus performs poorly on unlabeled data. Existing methods typically assume that the unlabeled class distribution is either known a priori, which is unrealistic in most situations, or estimate it on-the-fly using the pseudo-labels themselves. We propose to explicitly estimate the unlabeled class distribution, which is a finite-dimensional parameter, \emph{as an initial step}, using a doubly robust estimator with a strong theoretical guarantee; this estimate can then be integrated into existing methods to pseudo-label the unlabeled data during training more accurately. Experimental results demonstrate that incorporating our techniques into common pseudo-labeling approaches improves their performance.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pham2025improving,
  title  = {Improving realistic semi-supervised learning with doubly robust estimation},
  author = {Khiem Pham and Charles Herrmann and Ramin Zabih},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.00279},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00279v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.00279.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.00279)

Discussion