Learning to Partially Defer for Sequences

Sahana Rayan, Ambuj Tewari
2/3/2025
stat.MEcs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In the Learning to Defer (L2D) framework, a prediction model can either make a prediction or defer it to an expert, as determined by a rejector. Current L2D methods train the rejector to decide whether to reject the {\em entire prediction}, which is not desirable when the model predicts long sequences. We present an L2D setting for sequence outputs where the system can defer \textit{specific outputs} of the whole model prediction to an expert in an effort to interleave the expert and machine throughout the prediction. We propose two types of model-based post-hoc rejectors for pre-trained predictors: a token-level rejector, which defers specific token predictions to experts with next token prediction capabilities, and a one-time rejector for experts without such abilities, which defers the remaining sequence from a specific point onward. In the experiments, we also empirically demonstrate that such granular deferrals achieve better cost-accuracy tradeoffs than whole deferrals on Traveling salesman solvers, News summarization, and Weather prediction.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rayan2025learning,
  title  = {Learning to Partially Defer for Sequences},
  author = {Sahana Rayan and Ambuj Tewari},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.01459},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01459v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.01459.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.01459)

Discussion