Quantification of Biodiversity from Historical Survey Text with LLM-based Best-Worst Scaling

Thomas Haider, Tobias Perschl, Malte Rehbein
2/6/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluate methods to determine the frequency of species via quantity estimation from historical survey text. To that end, we formulate classification tasks and finally show that this problem can be adequately framed as a regression task using Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) with Large Language Models (LLMs). We test Ministral-8B, DeepSeek-V3, and GPT-4, finding that the latter two have reasonable agreement with humans and each other. We conclude that this approach is more cost-effective and similarly robust compared to a fine-grained multi-class approach, allowing automated quantity estimation across species.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{haider2025quantification,
  title  = {Quantification of Biodiversity from Historical Survey Text with LLM-based Best-Worst Scaling},
  author = {Thomas Haider and Tobias Perschl and Malte Rehbein},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.04022},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04022v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.04022.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.04022)

Discussion