Evaluating Personality Traits in Large Language Models: Insights from Psychological Questionnaires

Pranav Bhandari, Usman Naseem, Amitava Datta, Nicolas Fay, Mehwish Nasim
2/7/2025
cs.CLcs.AIcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Psychological assessment tools have long helped humans understand behavioural patterns. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate content comparable to that of humans, we explore whether they exhibit personality traits. To this end, this work applies psychological tools to LLMs in diverse scenarios to generate personality profiles. Using established trait-based questionnaires such as the Big Five Inventory and by addressing the possibility of training data contamination, we examine the dimensional variability and dominance of LLMs across five core personality dimensions: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. Our findings reveal that LLMs exhibit unique dominant traits, varying characteristics, and distinct personality profiles even within the same family of models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bhandari2025evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating Personality Traits in Large Language Models: Insights from Psychological Questionnaires},
  author = {Pranav Bhandari and Usman Naseem and Amitava Datta and Nicolas Fay and Mehwish Nasim},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.05248},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05248v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.05248.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.05248)

Discussion