Temporal Representation Alignment: Successor Features Enable Emergent Compositionality in Robot Instruction Following

Vivek Myers, Bill Chunyuan Zheng, Anca Dragan, Kuan Fang, Sergey Levine
2/8/2025
cs.ROcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Effective task representations should facilitate compositionality, such that after learning a variety of basic tasks, an agent can perform compound tasks consisting of multiple steps simply by composing the representations of the constituent steps together. While this is conceptually simple and appealing, it is not clear how to automatically learn representations that enable this sort of compositionality. We show that learning to associate the representations of current and future states with a temporal alignment loss can improve compositional generalization, even in the absence of any explicit subtask planning or reinforcement learning. We evaluate our approach across diverse robotic manipulation tasks as well as in simulation, showing substantial improvements for tasks specified with either language or goal images.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{myers2025temporal,
  title  = {Temporal Representation Alignment: Successor Features Enable Emergent Compositionality in Robot Instruction Following},
  author = {Vivek Myers and Bill Chunyuan Zheng and Anca Dragan and Kuan Fang and Sergey Levine},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.05454},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05454v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.05454.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.05454)

Discussion