Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models?

Gonçalo Gomes, Chrysoula Zerva, Bruno Martins
2/10/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: gecgomes/Multilingual_IC_Eval (0 stars, last commit 2025-01-31).

Abstract

The evaluation of image captions, looking at both linguistic fluency and semantic correspondence to visual contents, has witnessed a significant effort. Still, despite advancements such as the CLIPScore metric, multilingual captioning evaluation has remained relatively unexplored. This work presents several strategies, and extensive experiments, related to evaluating CLIPScore variants in multilingual settings. To address the lack of multilingual test data, we consider two different strategies: (1) using quality aware machine-translated datasets with human judgements, and (2) re-purposing multilingual datasets that target semantic inference and reasoning. Our results highlight the potential of finetuned multilingual models to generalize across languages and to handle complex linguistic challenges. Tests with machine-translated data show that multilingual CLIPScore models can maintain a high correlation with human judgements across different languages, and additional tests with natively multilingual and multicultural data further attest to the high-quality assessments.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models?

00Jan 31, 20251 years ago

Cite this paper

@article{gomes2025evaluation,
  title  = {Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models?},
  author = {Gonçalo Gomes and Chrysoula Zerva and Bruno Martins},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.06600},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06600v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.06600.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.06600)

Discussion