Quantile Multi-Armed Bandits with 1-bit Feedback

Ivan Lau, Jonathan Scarlett
2/10/2025
stat.MLcs.ITcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In this paper, we study a variant of best-arm identification involving elements of risk sensitivity and communication constraints. Specifically, the goal of the learner is to identify the arm with the highest quantile reward, while the communication from an agent (who observes rewards) and the learner (who chooses actions) is restricted to only one bit of feedback per arm pull. We propose an algorithm that utilizes noisy binary search as a subroutine, allowing the learner to estimate quantile rewards through 1-bit feedback. We derive an instance-dependent upper bound on the sample complexity of our algorithm and provide an algorithm-independent lower bound for specific instances, with the two matching to within logarithmic factors under mild conditions, or even to within constant factors in certain low error probability scaling regimes. The lower bound is applicable even in the absence of communication constraints, and thus we conclude that restricting to 1-bit feedback has a minimal impact on the scaling of the sample complexity.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lau2025quantile,
  title  = {Quantile Multi-Armed Bandits with 1-bit Feedback},
  author = {Ivan Lau and Jonathan Scarlett},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.06678},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06678v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.06678.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.06678)

Discussion