Medicine on the Edge: Comparative Performance Analysis of On-Device LLMs for Clinical Reasoning

Leon Nissen, Philipp Zagar, Vishnu Ravi, Aydin Zahedivash, Lara Marie Reimer +3 more
2/13/2025
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: StanfordBDHG/HealthBench (19 stars, MIT, last commit 2025-09-15).

Abstract

The deployment of Large Language Models (LLM) on mobile devices offers significant potential for medical applications, enhancing privacy, security, and cost-efficiency by eliminating reliance on cloud-based services and keeping sensitive health data local. However, the performance and accuracy of on-device LLMs in real-world medical contexts remain underexplored. In this study, we benchmark publicly available on-device LLMs using the AMEGA dataset, evaluating accuracy, computational efficiency, and thermal limitation across various mobile devices. Our results indicate that compact general-purpose models like Phi-3 Mini achieve a strong balance between speed and accuracy, while medically fine-tuned models such as Med42 and Aloe attain the highest accuracy. Notably, deploying LLMs on older devices remains feasible, with memory constraints posing a greater challenge than raw processing power. Our study underscores the potential of on-device LLMs for healthcare while emphasizing the need for more efficient inference and models tailored to real-world clinical reasoning.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

HealthBench

192Ruby, SwiftFeb 13, 20251 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{nissen2025medicine,
  title  = {Medicine on the Edge: Comparative Performance Analysis of On-Device LLMs for Clinical Reasoning},
  author = {Leon Nissen and Philipp Zagar and Vishnu Ravi and Aydin Zahedivash and Lara Marie Reimer and Stephan Jonas and Oliver Aalami and Paul Schmiedmayer},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.08954},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08954v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.08954.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.08954)

Discussion