Understanding High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization

Leonard Papenmeier, Matthias Poloczek, Luigi Nardi
2/1/2025

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Recent work reported that simple Bayesian optimization (BO) methods perform well for high-dimensional real-world tasks, seemingly contradicting prior work and tribal knowledge. This paper investigates why. We identify underlying challenges that arise in high-dimensional BO and explain why recent methods succeed. Our empirical analysis shows that vanishing gradients caused by Gaussian process (GP) initialization schemes play a major role in the failures of high-dimensional Bayesian optimization (HDBO) and that methods that promote local search behaviors are better suited for the task. We find that maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of GP length scales suffices for state-of-the-art performance. Based on this, we propose a simple variant of MLE called MSR that leverages these findings to achieve state-of-the-art performance on a comprehensive set of real-world applications. We present targeted experiments to illustrate and confirm our findings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{papenmeier2025understanding,
  title  = {Understanding High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization},
  author = {Leonard Papenmeier and Matthias Poloczek and Luigi Nardi},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.09198},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09198},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.09198.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.09198)

Discussion