Towards Watermarking of Open-Source LLMs

Thibaud Gloaguen, Nikola Jovanović, Robin Staab, Martin Vechev
2/14/2025
cs.CRcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

While watermarks for closed LLMs have matured and have been included in large-scale deployments, these methods are not applicable to open-source models, which allow users full control over the decoding process. This setting is understudied yet critical, given the rising performance of open-source models. In this work, we lay the foundation for systematic study of open-source LLM watermarking. For the first time, we explicitly formulate key requirements, including durability against common model modifications such as model merging, quantization, or finetuning, and propose a concrete evaluation setup. Given the prevalence of these modifications, durability is crucial for an open-source watermark to be effective. We survey and evaluate existing methods, showing that they are not durable. We also discuss potential ways to improve their durability and highlight remaining challenges. We hope our work enables future progress on this important problem.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{gloaguen2025towards,
  title  = {Towards Watermarking of Open-Source LLMs},
  author = {Thibaud Gloaguen and Nikola Jovanović and Robin Staab and Martin Vechev},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.10525},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10525v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.10525.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.10525)

Discussion