Is Self-Supervised Pre-training on Satellite Imagery Better than ImageNet? A Systematic Study with Sentinel-2

Saad Lahrichi, Zion Sheng, Shufan Xia, Kyle Bradbury, Jordan Malof
2/15/2025
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has demonstrated significant potential in pre-training robust models with limited labeled data, making it particularly valuable for remote sensing (RS) tasks. A common assumption is that pre-training on domain-aligned data provides maximal benefits on downstream tasks, particularly when compared to ImageNet-pretraining (INP). In this work, we investigate this assumption by collecting GeoNet, a large and diverse dataset of global optical Sentinel-2 imagery, and pre-training SwAV and MAE on both GeoNet and ImageNet. Evaluating these models on six downstream tasks in the few-shot setting reveals that SSL pre-training on RS data offers modest performance improvements over INP, and that it remains competitive in multiple scenarios. This indicates that the presumed benefits of SSL pre-training on RS data may be overstated, and the additional costs of data curation and pre-training could be unjustified.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lahrichi2025selfsupervised,
  title  = {Is Self-Supervised Pre-training on Satellite Imagery Better than ImageNet? A Systematic Study with Sentinel-2},
  author = {Saad Lahrichi and Zion Sheng and Shufan Xia and Kyle Bradbury and Jordan Malof},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.10669},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10669v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.10669.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.10669)

Discussion