Learning to Stop Overthinking at Test Time

Hieu Tran Bao, Nguyen Cong Dat, Nguyen Duc Anh, Hoang Thanh-Tung
2/16/2025
cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Test time scaling is currently one of the most active research areas that shows promise after training time scaling has reached its limits. Deep-thinking (DT) models are a class of recurrent models that can perform easy-to-hard generalization by assigning more compute to harder test samples. However, due to their inability to determine the complexity of a test sample, DT models have to use a large amount of computation for both easy and hard test samples. Excessive test time computation is wasteful and can cause the ``overthinking'' problem where more test time computation leads to worse results. In this paper, we introduce a test time training method for determining the optimal amount of computation needed for each sample during test time. We also propose Conv-LiGRU, a novel recurrent architecture for efficient and robust visual reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Conv-LiGRU is more stable than DT, effectively mitigates the ``overthinking'' phenomenon, and achieves superior accuracy.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bao2025learning,
  title  = {Learning to Stop Overthinking at Test Time},
  author = {Hieu Tran Bao and Nguyen Cong Dat and Nguyen Duc Anh and Hoang Thanh-Tung},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.10954},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10954v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.10954.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.10954)

Discussion