Uncertainty-Aware Step-wise Verification with Generative Reward Models

Zihuiwen Ye, Luckeciano Carvalho Melo, Younesse Kaddar, Phil Blunsom, Sam Staton +1 more
2/16/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Complex multi-step reasoning tasks, such as solving mathematical problems, remain challenging for large language models (LLMs). While outcome supervision is commonly used, process supervision via process reward models (PRMs) provides intermediate rewards to verify step-wise correctness in solution traces. However, as proxies for human judgement, PRMs suffer from reliability issues, including susceptibility to reward hacking. In this work, we propose leveraging uncertainty quantification (UQ) to enhance the reliability of step-wise verification with generative reward models for mathematical reasoning tasks. We introduce CoT Entropy, a novel UQ method that outperforms existing approaches in quantifying a PRM's uncertainty in step-wise verification. Our results demonstrate that incorporating uncertainty estimates improves the robustness of judge-LM PRMs, leading to more reliable verification.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{ye2025uncertaintyaware,
  title  = {Uncertainty-Aware Step-wise Verification with Generative Reward Models},
  author = {Zihuiwen Ye and Luckeciano Carvalho Melo and Younesse Kaddar and Phil Blunsom and Sam Staton and Yarin Gal},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.11250},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11250v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.11250.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.11250)

Discussion