Best of Both Worlds: Regret Minimization versus Minimax Play

Adrian Müller, Jon Schneider, Stratis Skoulakis, Luca Viano, V. Cevher
2/14/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the existence of online learning algorithms with bandit feedback that simultaneously guarantee $O(1)$ regret compared to a given comparator strategy, and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret compared to any fixed strategy, where $T$ is the number of rounds. We provide the first affirmative answer to this question whenever the comparator strategy supports every action. In the context of zero-sum games with min-max value zero, both in normal- and extensive form, we show that our results allow us to guarantee to risk at most $O(1)$ loss while being able to gain $\Omega(T)$ from exploitable opponents, thereby combining the benefits of both no-regret algorithms and minimax play.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mller2026best,
  title  = {Best of Both Worlds: Regret Minimization versus Minimax Play},
  author = {Adrian Müller and Jon Schneider and Stratis Skoulakis and Luca Viano and V. Cevher},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2502.11673},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11673},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.11673.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.11673)

Discussion