Adversarial Debiasing for Unbiased Parameter Recovery

Luke C Sanford, Megan Ayers, Matthew Gordon, Eliana Stone
2/17/2025
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Advances in machine learning and the increasing availability of high-dimensional data have led to the proliferation of social science research that uses the predictions of machine learning models as proxies for measures of human activity or environmental outcomes. However, prediction errors from machine learning models can lead to bias in the estimates of regression coefficients. In this paper, we show how this bias can arise, propose a test for detecting bias, and demonstrate the use of an adversarial machine learning algorithm in order to de-bias predictions. These methods are applicable to any setting where machine-learned predictions are the dependent variable in a regression. We conduct simulations and empirical exercises using ground truth and satellite data on forest cover in Africa. Using the predictions from a naive machine learning model leads to biased parameter estimates, while the predictions from the adversarial model recover the true coefficients.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sanford2025adversarial,
  title  = {Adversarial Debiasing for Unbiased Parameter Recovery},
  author = {Luke C Sanford and Megan Ayers and Matthew Gordon and Eliana Stone},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.12323},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12323v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.12323.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.12323)

Discussion