Multilingual European Language Models: Benchmarking Approaches and Challenges

Fabio Barth, Georg Rehm
2/18/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

The breakthrough of generative large language models (LLMs) that can solve different tasks through chat interaction has led to a significant increase in the use of general benchmarks to assess the quality or performance of these models beyond individual applications. There is also a need for better methods to evaluate and also to compare models due to the ever increasing number of new models published. However, most of the established benchmarks revolve around the English language. This paper analyses the benefits and limitations of current evaluation datasets, focusing on multilingual European benchmarks. We analyse seven multilingual benchmarks and identify four major challenges. Furthermore, we discuss potential solutions to enhance translation quality and mitigate cultural biases, including human-in-the-loop verification and iterative translation ranking. Our analysis highlights the need for culturally aware and rigorously validated benchmarks to assess the reasoning and question-answering capabilities of multilingual LLMs accurately.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{barth2025multilingual,
  title  = {Multilingual European Language Models: Benchmarking Approaches and Challenges},
  author = {Fabio Barth and Georg Rehm},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.12895},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12895v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.12895.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.12895)

Discussion