How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulation

Rui Li, Heming Xia, Xinfeng Yuan, Qingxiu Dong, Lei Sha +2 more
2/20/2025
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: O-L1RU1/BehaviorChain (12 stars, last commit 2026-01-28).

Abstract

Recently, LLMs have garnered increasing attention across academic disciplines for their potential as human digital twins, virtual proxies designed to replicate individuals and autonomously perform tasks such as decision-making, problem-solving, and reasoning on their behalf. However, current evaluations of LLMs primarily emphasize dialogue simulation while overlooking human behavior simulation, which is crucial for digital twins. To address this gap, we introduce BehaviorChain, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to simulate continuous human behavior. BehaviorChain comprises diverse, high-quality, persona-based behavior chains, totaling 15,846 distinct behaviors across 1,001 unique personas, each with detailed history and profile metadata. For evaluation, we integrate persona metadata into LLMs and employ them to iteratively infer contextually appropriate behaviors within dynamic scenarios provided by BehaviorChain. Comprehensive evaluation results demonstrated that even state-of-the-art models struggle with accurately simulating continuous human behavior.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

121Shell, PythonFeb 20, 20258 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2025llms,
  title  = {How Far are LLMs from Being Our Digital Twins? A Benchmark for Persona-Based Behavior Chain Simulation},
  author = {Rui Li and Heming Xia and Xinfeng Yuan and Qingxiu Dong and Lei Sha and Wenjie Li and Zhifang Sui},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.14642},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14642v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.14642.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.14642)

Discussion