Verification and Validation for Trustworthy Scientific Machine Learning

John D. Jakeman, Lorena A. Barba, Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, Thomas O'Leary-Roseberry
2/21/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Scientific machine learning (SciML) models are transforming many scientific disciplines. However, the development of good modeling practices to increase the trustworthiness of SciML has lagged behind its application, limiting its potential impact. The goal of this paper is to start a discussion on establishing consensus-based good practices for predictive SciML. We identify key challenges in applying existing computational science and engineering guidelines, such as verification and validation protocols, and provide recommendations to address these challenges. Our discussion focuses on predictive SciML, which uses machine learning models to learn, improve, and accelerate numerical simulations of physical systems. While centered on predictive applications, our 16 recommendations aim to help researchers conduct and document their modeling processes rigorously across all SciML domains.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{jakeman2025verification,
  title  = {Verification and Validation for Trustworthy Scientific Machine Learning},
  author = {John D. Jakeman and Lorena A. Barba and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins and Thomas O'Leary-Roseberry},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.15496},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15496v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.15496.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.15496)

Discussion