Expected Variational Inequalities

Brian Hu Zhang, Ioannis Anagnostides, Emanuel Tewolde, Ratip Emin Berker, Gabriele Farina +2 more
2/25/2025
cs.GTcs.LGmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Variational inequalities (VIs) encompass many fundamental problems in diverse areas ranging from engineering to economics and machine learning. However, their considerable expressivity comes at the cost of computational intractability. In this paper, we introduce and analyze a natural relaxation -- which we refer to as expected variational inequalities (EVIs) -- where the goal is to find a distribution that satisfies the VI constraint in expectation. By adapting recent techniques from game theory, we show that, unlike VIs, EVIs can be solved in polynomial time under general (nonmonotone) operators. EVIs capture the seminal notion of correlated equilibria, but enjoy a greater reach beyond games. We also employ our framework to capture and generalize several existing disparate results, including from settings such as smooth games, and games with coupled constraints or nonconcave utilities.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2025expected,
  title  = {Expected Variational Inequalities},
  author = {Brian Hu Zhang and Ioannis Anagnostides and Emanuel Tewolde and Ratip Emin Berker and Gabriele Farina and Vincent Conitzer and Tuomas Sandholm},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.18605},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18605v2},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.18605.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.18605)

Discussion