Beyond RNNs: Benchmarking Attention-Based Image Captioning Models

Hemanth Teja Yanambakkam, Rahul Chinthala
2/26/2025
cs.CVcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Image captioning is a challenging task at the intersection of computer vision and natural language processing, requiring models to generate meaningful textual descriptions of images. Traditional approaches rely on recurrent neural networks (RNNs), but recent advancements in attention mechanisms have demonstrated significant improvements. This study benchmarks the performance of attention-based image captioning models against RNN-based approaches using the MS-COCO dataset. We evaluate the effectiveness of Bahdanau attention in enhancing the alignment between image features and generated captions. The models are assessed using natural language processing metrics such as BLEU, METEOR, GLEU, and WER. Our results show that attention-based models outperform RNNs in generating more accurate and semantically rich captions, with better alignment to human evaluation. This work provides insights into the impact of attention mechanisms in image captioning and highlights areas for future improvements.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yanambakkam2025beyond,
  title  = {Beyond RNNs: Benchmarking Attention-Based Image Captioning Models},
  author = {Hemanth Teja Yanambakkam and Rahul Chinthala},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.18734},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18734v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.18734.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.18734)

Discussion