Evaluation and Facilitation of Online Discussions in the LLM Era: A Survey

Katerina Korre, Dimitris Tsirmpas, Nikos Gkoumas, Emma Cabalé, Danai Myrtzani +3 more
3/3/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We present a survey of methods for assessing and enhancing the quality of online discussions, focusing on the potential of LLMs. While online discourses aim, at least in theory, to foster mutual understanding, they often devolve into harmful exchanges, such as hate speech, threatening social cohesion and democratic values. Recent advancements in LLMs enable artificial facilitation agents to not only moderate content, but also actively improve the quality of interactions. Our survey synthesizes ideas from NLP and Social Sciences to provide (a) a new taxonomy on discussion quality evaluation, (b) an overview of intervention and facilitation strategies, (c) along with a new taxonomy of conversation facilitation datasets, (d) an LLM-oriented roadmap of good practices and future research directions, from technological and societal perspectives.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{korre2025evaluation,
  title  = {Evaluation and Facilitation of Online Discussions in the LLM Era: A Survey},
  author = {Katerina Korre and Dimitris Tsirmpas and Nikos Gkoumas and Emma Cabalé and Danai Myrtzani and Theodoros Evgeniou and Ion Androutsopoulos and John Pavlopoulos},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.01513},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01513v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.01513.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.01513)

Discussion