Full-Duplex-Bench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Full-duplex Spoken Dialogue Models on Turn-taking Capabilities

Guan-Ting Lin, Jiachen Lian, Tingle Li, Qirui Wang, Gopala Anumanchipalli +2 more
3/6/2025
cs.CLeess.AS

No official code found. Best implementation: DanielLin94144/Full-Duplex-Bench (314 stars, last commit 2026-04-15).

Abstract

Spoken dialogue modeling poses challenges beyond text-based language modeling, requiring real-time interaction, turn-taking, and backchanneling. While most Spoken Dialogue Models (SDMs) operate in half-duplex mode-processing one turn at a time - emerging full-duplex SDMs can listen and speak simultaneously, enabling more natural conversations. However, current evaluations remain limited, focusing mainly on turn-based metrics or coarse corpus-level analyses. To address this, we introduce Full-Duplex-Bench, a benchmark that systematically evaluates key interactive behaviors: pause handling, backchanneling, turn-taking, and interruption management. Our framework uses automatic metrics for consistent, reproducible assessment and provides a fair, fast evaluation setup. By releasing our benchmark and code, we aim to advance spoken dialogue modeling and foster the development of more natural and engaging SDMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

A Benchmark for Evaluating Turn-Taking and Overlap Handling in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models

31433CSS, HTMLFeb 17, 20256 months agoNOASSERTION

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lin2025fullduplexbench,
  title  = {Full-Duplex-Bench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Full-duplex Spoken Dialogue Models on Turn-taking Capabilities},
  author = {Guan-Ting Lin and Jiachen Lian and Tingle Li and Qirui Wang and Gopala Anumanchipalli and Alexander H. Liu and Hung-yi Lee},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.04721},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04721v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.04721.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.04721)

Discussion